Prismiva IntelligencePrismivaResearch standards
Prismiva is built to keep reported facts, third-party estimates, market observations, model output, and user content distinct—and to correct material errors without erasing the record.
Prismiva prefers issuer filings and investor-relations releases for company facts, official exchange or licensed provider data for market observations, and clearly labeled providers for analyst consensus and news. Secondary sources do not silently replace missing first-party evidence.
Research should reflect only information available at the stated time. Pages display observed, provider-updated, and Prismiva-checked timestamps where they serve different purposes.
AI can help organize and explain attached evidence, but it must not invent missing facts, hide conflicting inputs, or convert data confidence into a probability of profit. Material answers keep citations or disclose the coverage gap.
Model versions, policy gates, evaluation periods, abstentions, and completed outcomes remain auditable. A qualitative action is not presented as a validated probability unless a separately tested forecast supports that number.
Material data and research errors are corrected when verified. Send the ticker, field, visible timestamp, expected value, and supporting source to support@prismiva.com. Security and privacy reports use their dedicated contact addresses.
Subscription revenue, data-provider agreements, infrastructure vendors, and brokerage-connection providers do not guarantee coverage or a favorable conclusion. Prismiva does not sell order flow and read-only brokerage access cannot place trades.